Advertisement
image_pdfimage_print

If the day ever comes that you spar with a prizefighter, you’ll find yourself defenseless soon enough. Exhausted or confused, you’ll drop your hands or head in a silent plea for leniency. That’s when you’ll see it, no matter the other man’s decency: a click behind his eyes, almost audible, before he hits you to hurt you because you are defenseless in front of him and that is what a prizefighter does.

It is difficult to believe a professional fighter could rise to the titlist level and somehow forget this. Yet that is what Victor Ortiz did Saturday.

The result – his unconsciousness – was no surprise whatever. That is how Ortiz lost his WBC welterweight belt to Floyd Mayweather in MGM Grand at 2:59 of round 4. He stood before a world champion, hands lowered, and expected leniency. Mayweather checked this idiocy with a left hook. Ortiz turned toward the referee and showed incredulity. Then Mayweather took Ortiz’s consciousness with a right cross.

We can return to what oddities preceded this exchange in a bit. But for now, let’s put it here: Saturday night, one man acted like a fighter, and the other did not.

Mayweather did not look invincible in the first moments of his fight with Ortiz. Absent from the ring 16 months, Mayweather lunged with lead right hands that showed an erosion of foot and leg speed. Still, Mayweather knew that if his reflexes were superior to Ortiz’s, which they were, the rest would be details. He landed right-hand leads enough in the opening three minutes to know Ortiz’s only chance of beating him was if Mayweather made a mistake.

If Ortiz had a chance against Mayweather, it came early. As Shane Mosley clipped Mayweather in the opening five minutes of their 2010 fight, so Ortiz needed to clip Mayweather before the second round ended, Saturday. Ortiz did not. He winged wild right hooks from his southpaw stance, punches Mayweather saw easily enough to duck, rock his weight from back foot to front, and pivot away from. The opening bell of round 3 marked the start of hunting season for Mayweather who followed his trainer’s advice and walked Ortiz down.

Some of Ortiz’s subsequent retreat was conscious trap-setting. Most of it, though, was doing as his superior ordered. Ortiz had been hit hard in previous fights by slower and less-accurate punchers than Mayweather. He’d also shown a certain spaceshot-edness, a likelihood of putting his mind in a place far away. HBO may have made boxing fans forget this by hypnotically chanting “big, young, strong welterweight.” But Mayweather was not fooled.

If there were insights to be mined from HBO’s “24/7” infomercials, they were two: 1. Mayweather held Ortiz’s victimized-upbringing story in absolute contempt, and 2. Mayweather heard in Ortiz’s explanation for the Marcos Maidana debacle – that Ortiz didn’t remember any of it and therefore was not responsible for quitting – a set of spoken instructions for how to undo the 24-year old.

Ortiz wrestled Mayweather to the ropes toward the end of the fourth round, in the match’s most competitive moment. For an instant, it seemed possible Mayweather might fixate on how little his opponent’s last punch hurt at the expense of slipping the next. But Mayweather gathered himself and had Ortiz neutralized while the referee meandered over. Ortiz then left his feet in an attempt to spear Mayweather with his head. It was flagrant and vulgar. Even Mayweather didn’t have a proper defense for that, and despite yanking backwards still incurred a cut on his lower lip.

The sort of cut that stings like hell.

The referee began his penalty dance, and Ortiz – temporarily returned to his right mind – ran to hug Mayweather in apology. Mayweather rather graciously accepted the apology, even allowing Ortiz to kiss his cheek without clocking him. But Mayweather was rightfully furious. Then the referee sort of brought the fighters together and sort of indicated the fight was live again. Ortiz walked to Mayweather, hands down, and gave him another hug. Mayweather halfheartedly returned the embrace and did not yet retaliate for Ortiz’s head butt. Once the men were at fighting distance, though, Mayweather snapped a left hook at Ortiz, in an acceptable act of retribution.

At that very moment, a world champion – a Manny Pacquiao or Juan Manuel Marquez – would have acted like one. Marquez would have raised his hands, dropped his chin and circled away; Pacquiao would have leaped at his foe.

Ortiz dropped his hands, arranged a disbelieving look on his face and glanced 60 degrees from his opponent, seeking a score-evening penalty call from the referee whose own gaze was 60 degrees from the fight he was paid to supervise. Only Mayweather’s eyes stayed were they belonged. Then Mayweather put Ortiz’s lights out.

The ending brought a nervous tension Mayweather fights rarely do. For once, it became clear, Mayweather disliked his opponent more than his opponent disliked him. Mayweather saw in Ortiz an insincere usurper – a fraudulent stage prop created by HBO to evoke sympathy – and genuinely did not like the man. When Ortiz added to Mayweather’s estimation with a remarkable act of cheating, Mayweather served Ortiz the comeuppance he believed he deserved.

Only if you believe Mayweather – or believe even Mayweather believes Mayweather – when he says he belongs in a conversation about boxing’s greatest, do you ask a rhetorical question like: Was that any way for Mayweather to win a world title?

Mayweather – destined for jail, bankruptcy, or both in the next 20 years – speaks to fill the air with sounds till he provokes a reaction. Outside the ring, he is a whirligig of poor choices. Entertaining any of his claims says more about you than him.

But in the ring, Floyd Mayweather is a remarkable specimen. He is a fighter, and comported himself like one Saturday. His opponent did not. The better man won – as it should be.

Bart Barry can be reached via Twitter @bartbarry

BRIEFS. web site easton express times

NewsInc May 23, 2011 *Gannett merges USA Today, USA Weekend groups: The editorial team creating the “Your Life” section of USA Today and its affiliated web sites and the news staff that has produced USA Weekend — the Sunday supplement that is distributed by more than 800 newspapers — have been merged, Gannett Co. Inc., the two publications’ owner, announced last week. Charles Gabrielson, the president and publisher of USA Weekend, will continue to supervise sales, marketing and research and affiliate relations, the company said, while Heather Frank, the vice president of consumer media for USA Today, will run the editorial groups. Frank appointed Christine Allegro, who joined USA Today in November, as general manager of the “Your Life” group. Earlier, Allego spent a decade with AOL and before that spent a decade with Where magazine of Washington, D.C. Frank also appointed Nancy Kerr as editor of the “Your Life” group; Kerr joined USA Today earlier this month after 6-3/4 years at WashingtonPost.com, where she was an AME for features. Earlier, Kerr spent 4-1/2 years at AOL, 1-1/4 years at CBS.com and 5-3/4 years at Soap Opera Digest.

*Tribune shareholders must share: Tribune Co.’s bankruptcy judge ruled last week that those who held shares in the publicly traded company before it went public in 2007 must tell the company’s bondholders what they received for their shares during the leveraged buyout. Bondholders, led by Aurelius Capital Management LP, argued the information is material to their plan to attempt to recover as much money as possible from the LBO, as a court examiner last summer opined that at least one part of the LBO was probably a fraudulent conveyance. Lawyers for Aurelius promised to keep the information confidential in any lawsuits they may file, which have a June 4 deadline. Tribune’s buyout ended up saddling the company with an additional $8,000 million in debt and when the company filed for bankruptcy in 2008, it had $13,000 million of debt. Lawyers and accountants believe the company is current worth about $6,750 million. The Delaware federal judge hearing Tribune’s case will rule sometime in June on which of two reorganization plans to adopt, one written by Aurelius and partners and one by Tribune’s management.

*AbitibiBowater posts gain: Foreign currency gains propelled AbitibiBowater Inc., the continent’s largest maker of newsprint, into a first-quarter profit, the Montreal-based company said last week. The paper and forestry-products company said its net income was $C30 million ($US30.6 million), or 31 Canadian cents (32 U.S. cents) per diluted share. But the company said its one-time earnings in the quarter included a $C29 million ($US29.6 million) gain on currency exchange and a $C1 million ($US1.02 million) gain on asset sales. In last year’s first quarter, the company was in bankruptcy and posted a net loss of $C500 million ($US484 million) or $C8.68 ($US8.41) per share. First quarter 2011 newsprint operating income was $C19 million ($US19.4 million), up from last year’s operating loss of $C102 million ($US98.8 million). The company said newsprint prices had increased $C10 ($US10.22) per metric ton (tonnes) since the first of the year, but that newsprint shipments had decreased 97,000 tonnes since the fourth quarter of last year. here easton express times

*Pa. papers protest public-notice kill bill: Pennsylvania legislators hearing testimony on a bill designed to eliminate the requirement that local governments and school districts publish public notices in newspapers — and instead host the information on their own web sites — were told last Thursday that thousands of newspaper employees would lose their jobs and that their would be untold additional costs associated with such a shift. Speaking against the bill were Martin Till, publisher of Advance’s Easton Express-Times, Ernest Schreiber, editor of the Lancaster New Era and Bernard Oravec, publisher of Ogden’s Williamsport Sun-Gazette, reported the Bucks County Courier Times of Levittown, Pa. The paper quoted Till as saying that it’s a “myth” that local governments spends “tens of thousands of dollars with us … it’s just not true.” Also speaking against the bill were representatives of the AARP, the public interest group for people aged 50 and older.

*Sacramento paper lays off 44: McClatchy’s flagship Sacramento Bee reported this morning that it was laying off 44 workers from throughout the operation. The story comes in a month when the newspaper company has said it is cutting a proportionate number of jobs at its other papers: early in the month it said it was cutting “about two dozen” jobs and eliminating “a smaller number of unfilled positions” at its Kansas City Star, 20 jobs at its News & Observer in Raleigh, N.C., about 50 jobs at its Charlotte Observer in South Carolina, 15 jobs at its Lexington Herald-Leader in Kentucky and 45 jobs at its Fort Worth Star-Telegram in Texas. Also this month, the company reported a $2 million loss in its first quarter.

Advertisement